Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GPT-Image-1
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GPT-Image-1OpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 67/100 | 82/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GPT-Image-1 | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 3/100 | 1/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 — Tool calling not supported |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
0
Reasoning
True
False
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Image
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$5.00/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.4M
0
Completed sessions
87,861,399
0
Token share
32.8%
0%
Tokens
375T+100%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
68.9%318K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGPT-Image-1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGPT-Image-1·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGPT-Image-1 vs Jamba MiniGPT-Image-1·Jamba Mini