Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiMo-V2-Omni

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
MiMo-V2-OmniXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	100/100	100/100	83/100	82/100	33/100	92/100
MiMo-V2-Omni	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	64/100	83/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

DeepSeek

Xiaomi

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Audio, Video, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

DeepSeek

Xiaomi

Pricing

Input

$0.05/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$0.21/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.001074/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

3.3M

3.5K

Completed sessions

87,130,499

8,972

Token share

32.7%

Tokens

373T+100%

00%

AUG 29OCT 23

No trend data

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

68.9%318K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeMiMo-V2-Omni vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2-OmniDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonMiMo-V2-Omni vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2-OmniJamba Mini