Compare AI models: Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Max
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 93/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Output
$10/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
849
40K
Completed sessions
2,062
87,133
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
3.1B+100%
32B-89%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
49.3%1.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba Mini