Compare AI models: Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- Hy3Tencent
- MiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomiHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 68/100 | 64/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | 40/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | 14/100 | 71/100 | 60/100 | 93/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.21/ 1M
$0.46/ 1M
Output
$0.85/ 1M
$0.92/ 1M
Cached input
$0.05/ 1M
$0.003809/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
105K
86K
Completed sessions
1,337,656
360,551
Token share
0.1%
0.07%
Tokens
1.1T-81%
810B-64%
AUG 29OCT 23
AUG 29OCT 23
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
70.1%2.9K user-weeks
63.6%4.3K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5-Pro·Jamba Mini