Compare AI models: GLM-5.3-Flash vs GLM-5-Turbo
- GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu
- GLM-5-TurboZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-5.3-Flash | 56/100 | 35/100 | 71/100 | 82/100 | 67/100 | 0/100 |
| GLM-5-Turbo | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 36/100 | 47/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.12/ 1M
$0.72/ 1M
Output
$0.42/ 1M
$3.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1M
0
Completed sessions
13,429,274
1
Token share
2.74%
0%
Tokens
31T-31%
00%
AUG 29OCT 23
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
63.2%93K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5-Turbo vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5-Turbo·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5-Turbo vs Jamba MiniGLM-5-Turbo·Jamba Mini